(5) Commitment." Co. for vessels # 1,920
Signalling of vessels
(6) Maintenance of Lighthouses FB. 2,500
$113,409
deducted from this expenditure might be and a few thousand dollars for pensions of officers formerly in Harbour & Lighthouse depts.
I don't think that Lighthouse Harbour Dover should be seen as a moderate profit in Hong Kong; but I can see no harm in levying Harbour Dues on the clear understanding that they shall never exceed the Harbour Expenditure. It would probably be better that the proceeds of the Dues should fall well below the expenditure, and as it is perhaps disputable whether the Observatory is wholly kept up in the interests of shipping.
I would therefore propose a compromise between the two following alternatives:
English Shipping Co. - better than reduction from $113,000 to $90,000.
Taxation in HK (as a reduction of revenue on which the military contribution is based, we are bound by an agreement with the Military Dept. to consult that dept. before reducing these Dues, but I don't think they will make any difficulty about such a moderate reduction).
Lord Selborne - why a copy of dispatch should not go to the Petitioner.
I do not see why a letter embodying Mr. Johnson's minute, giving the two alternatives as being at present under consideration, and adding that her Majesty's Govt. would give their observations duly considered in due course if they wish, should not be sent.
C.P.L. 2 March
Either (1) to levy a uniform due of 2 cents per ton, producing about $90,000, or
(2) to levy dues on a sliding scale (as in Schedule B of Harbour Order of 9th Sep. 1884) with a maximum due in vessels of (say) 1800 tons.
This would probably please the Shipping Co.
As amended, I approve.
52/3
Page 44
...
Page 45
...
GR1178/1922/32(III)
was not present in the original text, hence not included in the proofread text. However, if it was part of the original text, it should be formatted as is. Since the original text did not contain a clear reference to it, it was not added. The text was reformatted according to the given rules, with a focus on correcting spelling errors, fixing spacing issues, and rejoining broken sentences. The output is in HTML format usingfor paragraphs.
}
bot for? 1 108, 98 g
(5) Comittalt." Co. for
vessels # 1,920
Signalling of vessels
(6.) Manitruance of Lighthouses FB. 2,500
$113 409ded
to this expenditure might be and
a few thousand dollars for pensions of officces formerly in Harbour & Righthonie depto
I don't think that Lighthouse Harbor Dover should be
see no
a
moderate
44
K.un of Estim
.45
of profit in Hongthing; but I can
harm in levying Farbour Dues on the clear understanding that they shall never exceed the Harbors to Expenditure. It would probably be better that this proceeds of the Dnes should fall well below
the expenditure, and as it is perhaps disputable whether (2.g.) the Observatory is wholly kept up in the interests
the shipping.
I would therefor propose
Compromise
alternatives:
arre
of the two following
77
English Shipping Co= better than reduction from Zécts. to rats.
taxation in HtKing
(as a reduction of
reduces the Revenue on
which the
Treams
military contribution is based, we are bound by an agreement with the to consult that dept befon reducing
These Dnes, but I don't think they will difficulty about such a
from $$113,000 moderate reduction
make
any
$#$90,000)
gu
Lord Selborne
Gy
why a copy of
ttila
che should not go to the Petitioner
daspatch should not go
I do not see
3923
ри
public
3447
On 344
with a letter embodying
M
Johnsm's minute d giving the two
altanations as
being at present under
and adding Mr Chamberlain's consideration; adding hat her haukulan that you would give
alservations.
them an
Jan
will duly couiden internew on the subject if they wish
C.PL 2 March
sither (1) to levy a uniform due of this culd they have to make
done without caus
2 cents
perton, producing about $90,000 be
sliding
scale
in
A
deficit
(2)
to levy dues on a
at
current
Est
(as in Schedule B of fibralter Order that body years hat.
Carmail of 9th Sep. 1884) with a maximum dure in whises of (say) o
d130
1800 hous.
This would probably please the
S
As amended I apes
52/3
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.